Oswald Assassination

Critique of John McAdams
Subject: Critique of John McAdams by Jeff Orr - 02/08/00

I would have to say that John McAdams either has mental problems, or is a conscious and deliberate agent of dis-information. Perhaps he is both, but no one could be as familiar with the facts as he seems to be and still advocate such a position. I would like to explain my experience with Mr. John McAdams, and try to let that experience speak to the reputation of this person.

I wish that I had copies of the posts that I put up at his newsgroup location. If I am able to get a copy of that I will be glad to furnish it as proof. I didn't know that the JFK assassination newsgroup that I was posting on was affiliated to the McAdams website, until after my posts were removed and I was blocked from making any further posts. I am not a serious researcher but I have looked very closely into the JFK assassination and I put a post on that newsgroup. The subject of the post was the question "Where was George Bush on the day Kennedy was assassinated?" My post explained that the day following the assassination Bush had met with J Edgar Hoover to discuss JFK's murder, and that those in Dallas that day included Frank Sturgis, Howard Hunt, and Jack Ruby. I also made a post about the motivation for Jack Ruby to kill Oswald. The subject of that post was speculation that Oswald was probably meant to die in the theater, and that Ruby had to act in this way because the plotters intended Oswald to be the dead "patsy" following the assassination.

McAdams sarcastically responded to the posts with a speed that arouses suspicion. Because who has time to sit by a computer and watch the posts as they come in? He claimed that there was no evidence to support anything I said in the Bush post. I can't remember what he said about the Ruby post. He could do no more than to refute every reference by claiming that the info and the sources were phony or false. He ended by saying that what I had offered were only "factiods". So I coolly responded with the complete info and the sources, still thinking that this information was probably unknown to him, and that he would take the info seriously when I gave him the references and more background on them. There was nothing hostile or rude in my response only good solid sources for the claims I made; yet the post was removed within minutes. I had tried to post it at a second JFK assassination newsgroup and found that it wouldn't accept my post. I tried to re-post at the site that had briefly contained my reply to McAdams, but found that the site was blocking my posts just as the other site was. I can't say for sure, but I am fairly sure he is the person who has censored my posts.

Here we have a chap who has a tremendous amount of time on his hands to promote a fiction about the assassination of JFK through websites, newsgroups, and no telling what other means. Whether he is a paid dis-information specialist, or unpaid, he is definitely promoting information that is knowingly false to him. His opinions cannot stand in a debate with an informed person. He cannot help but contradict himself in defending his untenable position. He is not trying to seek the truth whatever it may be, he is trying to promote myths that exonerate those who are implicated by evidence in the assassination of their own leader, a United States President named John F. Kennedy. He is out to discredit people who are putting the logical conclusions together from the irrefutable evidence. Whatever his reasons are for trying to continue the cover-up of the JFK assassination, I don't have any appreciation of them.

Jeff Orr

Postscript: It looks like Jeff Orr's question has been answered.

Exhibit #1

Lee Harvey Oswald watched Kennedy just like everybody else did.

Three witnesses confirm the fact that Lovelady was with them on the steps of the Depository, William Shelley (6H328), Sarah Stanton (22H647), and Wesley Frazier (22H675). But in the WCH, Shelley testified under oath that Lovelady was SITTING DOWN on the top step directly in front of Shelley, and that is why the man pictured in the Doorway is not Lovelady, and J. Edgar Hoover knew it. Even Lovelady claimed that he was with Shelley. Moreover, Lovelady worked on the 6th floor of the Texas School Book Depository, and he was an eyewitness to the fact that the shots came from "across the street" and not from the Texas School Book Depository. So any way you look at it, Lovelady proves that Lee Harvey Oswald did not act alone.

In desperate effort to discredit Exhibit #1, McAdams & Company published a 1971 photograph of Lovelady, to demonstrate the fact that his hairline matched the dark shadows around the forehead of the man in the doorway. McAdams is so desperate to convince the world that the man in the doorway is actually Lovelady, that his picture of Lovelady boasted the following caption: "Shape of Lovelady's hairline matches Doorway man." The pictue that McAdams produces does not even have a hairline. The hairline is shaved off to mimick dark shadows around the forehead of the man in the Doorway. Don't forget that the picture of the man in the doorway is too fuzzy, to accurately determine the actual shape of the hairline of the person in the Doorway. Regardless, without a moments delay, McAdam groupies immediately began to post messages drooling over the "photographic evidence" that McAdams produced, and they thanked the "master" so profusely, that if all this was not made for the consumption of the ignorant and the gullible, then John McAdams is the sort of academic who deserves a Nobel Prize, simply because he has a following that drools over every single word he utters. Despite his groupies, McAdams has to be the only person in the world, who can identify a person from a hairline that does not even exist. It is no wonder that John McAdams has developed the reputation of being the laughing stock of the entire Internet. Clearly, this is one crackpot who has worked very hard, to earn his reputation.

Needless to say, John McAdams never fails to be absolutely predictable -he attacks everything and everyone who exposes the truth about the assassination of John F. Kennedy. And if that is not what you call a cover up, then Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. And so did Jack Ruby. And so did John McAdams, who never fails to target every single, reasonable, Kennedy Assassination website. Please do not drool over simple common sense because it's just a factoid. We are not supposed to speculate, we are supposed to drool over the absolute brilliance of a crackpot or a cover up artist like John McAdams.

McAdams is a prolific, Kennedy assassination cover up artist who has developed his own lexicon and his own fan club. A 'factoid' is a simple truth that needs to be fraudulently modified, to cover up the truth about the assassination of John F. Kennedy. A McAdams groupie, and there are literally dozens of them who post messages in newsgroups, are the people who drool over every single fraudulent modification. And there is absolutely nothing more and nothing less to John McAdams or to anybody who defends the reputation of the fraud artist who covered up the truth about the Kennedy assassination. More on Mcadams


Distorting the photographic evidence

The first step to creating the false impression that Oswald was on the
6th floor of the School Book Depository was to distort the Altgens photograph.
Clearly, it is not possible to remove a face or faces from the area of the
doorway of the TSBD unless the Altgens photo was deliberately defaced as it was.

Oswald and Lovelady were both in the doorway.

Police evidence proves that both Lee Harvey Oswald and Bill Lovelady were at the doorway at the same time, when Kennedy was shot, because they both identified Bill Shelley, who was standing in the doorway with them.

Mr. BALL - Who was with you?
Mr. LOVELADY - Bill Shelley and Sarah Stanton, and right behind me...
Mr. BALL - What was that last name?
Mr. LOVELADY - Stanton.
Mr. BALL - What is the first name?
Mr. LOVELADY - Bill Shelley.
Mr. BALL - And Stanton's first name?
Mr. LOVELADY - Miss Sarah Stanton.
Mr. BALL - Did you stay on the steps
Mr. BALL - Were you there when the President's motorcade went by
Mr. LOVELADY - Right.
Mr. BALL - Did you hear anything?
Mr. LOVELADY - Yes, sir; sure did.

So you see, the evidence is conclusive, and Oswald's claim about the phony backyard photos is precedent because
it explains the process of cutting Billy Lovelady's face and pasting it over Oswalds and then blanking out Lovelady
in the original. That would explain every anomaly, including the fact that Billy's shirt isn't as unbuttoned as it
is in the Altgens photo. Needless to say, if Lee Harvey Oswald was on the 6th floor shooting the President he would
would not be aware of the fact Bill Shelley was standing in the doorway with Lovelady, when John F. Kennedy was shot.

Comments - Questions? -

Copyright 2010

Look who's talking

It's not CNN, it's not CNBC, it's not NBC, it's not Fox...

Message Board -Click Here !