Kidnapping and Extortion
May 2, 2004
On February 6, 2003, ABC News reported that "Michael Jackson, who
was accused of molesting a 13-year-old boy a decade ago but denied
it, says in a new documentary that he still allows children to sleep
over at his California ranch, Neverland."
ABC News also reported the following. "The boy, who says he met
Jackson after he was diagnosed with terminal cancer, said when he
asked to spend the night in the singer's bedroom, Jackson gave him
and his brother the bed and slept on the floor himself." After
extensive coaching and prompting from a mother who has a history of
exploiting criminal allegations, the boys have a different story to
tell, today. Would you like to hear it? Oh, go ahead and make it up,
any cheap pornographer can easily invent a tawdry tale, the media is
good at it.
It was not until May, when the mother of Jackson's accuser met
with Larry Feldman, who'd represented the family in the Jackson case
10 years ago, that accusations of child molestation were made.
Needless to say, the fact that these allegations were such a big
secret prior to May, needs to be explained. Kidnapping, death
threats and coercion are an explanation which suggests that nobody
said anything out of fear for their lives, but the District Attorney
must come to grips with the fact that the explanation has to be
reasonable, not outrageous.
It is quite clear that whoever is coaching the mother in this
transparent scam to extort Michael Jackson is putting a great deal
of thought into explaining away the fact that the family didn't tell
anybody about sexual molestation allegations prior to May, but it
doesn't make any sense to turn around and say that they were
kidnapped to cover up something that was kept secret. Needless to
say, this case is not about making sense. It is about extortion again because as soon as all the
phantom, criminal co-conspirators are lined up and successfully
prosecuted, then Michael Jackson's estate is essentially the
property of civil litigation attorneys. That's the plan, but have
Michael Jackson's accusers bitten off more than they can chew?
The driving force behind this Inquisition is Tom Sneddon, and
whether he is acting on good faith or not, the perpetual vendetta
against Michael Jackson is providing the opportunity to amalgamate
the forces that seek to exploit the opportunity to extort a
vulnerable target. On February 14, 2001, Tom Sneddon said, "The case
against Michael Jackson was never closed, and he was never
exonerated. It's in suspended animation and can be reopened at any
time." The Bashir documentary invariably made Tom Sneddon feel
vindicated by what was viewed to be a tawdry portrayal of Michael
Jackson and that set the stage to accept the open invitation that
Sneddon had issued in 1996, when he said, "the state of the
investigation is in suspension until somebody comes forward and
testifies." Tom Sneddon's open invitation is currently conspiring to
pervert justice because it was accepted by those who have a history
of exploiting false criminal allegations. The accuser appeared on
national TV in the Bashir documentary holding hands with Jackson,
who said the two had slept in the same bedroom but not the same bed.
Jackson defended his sleep overs with children, describing the
practice as sweet and innocent. The boy said he had met Jackson two
years earlier and believed the singer's friendship and support had
helped him recover from what doctors had said was terminal cancer
and his parents were happy to let him spend time with Jackson. And
now, we are supposed to believe that the family was not happy, the
family was kidnapped.
Where do you find 12 people to believe that Michael Jackson, who
never touched this cancer victim for over 2 years while he helped
him recover, waited for the Bashir documentary to decide to molest
the kid? The truth of the matter is, the Bashir documentary prompted
those who are inclined to call Michael Jackson a child molester to
suggest the worst and set the stage for the latest extortion effort,
but this scam is way too elaborate to take seriously. The smoke and
mirrors effort to create something out of nothing will never amount
to anything because Michael Jackson is a public figure who leads a
public life and the Bashir Documentary exposed the full extent of
Michael Jackson's so called "weirdness," it did not leave anything
for the imagination of those who are currently seeking to create the
impression that Neverland is Alcatraz with valet parking. The only
hell on earth where Neverland is concerned is created by overbearing
opportunists who overstay their welcome because they are vulgar and
inconsiderate.
The suggestion that anybody has ever been threatened and coerced
to keep them from leaving Neverland is quite amusing, and it makes
the false nature of the sexual molestation charges against Michael
Jackson, very clear. The modus operandi of an overzealous prosecutor
like Ted Sneddon is to put out as wide a net as possible to drag in
as many fish as he can, so that he can work on the opportunity to
squeeze the hell out of them. In the hands of a desperate prosecutor
who cannot prove sexual molestation charges against Michael Jackson,
co-conspiracy charges provide the opportunity that is required to
compensate for sexual molestation allegations that are too weak, to
stand on their own. It's an old trick that is used to squeeze
criminals, but when it is used to target innocent people it is a
repugnant scheme. Clearly, the zeal to destroy Michael Jackson's
friends, simply because Tom Sneddon wants to destroy Michael
Jackson, will never triumph. American soldiers are dying in Iraq as
we speak, to give people the opportunity to be free of evil
dictators, free of celebrity showboat trials, and free of
overzealous prosecutors who make a mockery of the entire justice
system.
The Grand Jury indictment said Jackson conspired with "other
uncharged conspirators and co-conspirators," but the judge ordered
that the parts of the indictment identifying them be removed before
it was publicly released. What's the big secret? It is not even
remotely plausible to cover up a scam that is so absolutely
transparent, that not even Grand Jury secrecy will grant Tom Sneddon
the competitive advantage he seeks. This game is over, and if Tom
Sneddon is deluded enough to think that he is a serious player of
his perpetual effort to "drive the weirdo out of town" nothing has
changed.
Why is the Grand Jury beating around the bush, we all know who
the co-conspirators are. Anybody who is in a position to prove that
Michael Jackson is innocent, is supposed to be an evil,
co-conspirator. It's like the insanity that surrounds the Laci
Peterson case. Anybody who saw Laci walking the dog is either wrong,
stupid, crazy or dead.
What Tom Sneddon is trying to do, to create the impression that
Michael Jackson is a mastermind kidnapper is to cultivate somebody
called an unindicted co-conspirator. It's a neat trick. All Tom has
to do is to find somebody he can intimidate, threaten to lock him
away for life if he doesn't cooperate, and grant him immunity,
formal or otherwise, if he suggests that Michael Jackson conspired
to coerce the person he allegedly molested. Some trick, huh? Tom
Sneddon wants us to think that Michael Jackson used people like
Frank Tyson and Vinnie Amen, to coerce a mother and her children to
the point where they were afraid to reveal that Michael Jackson had
sexually molested her son. The problem is, the women and her sons
are tripping all over their lies in the process, because in effort
to feign credibility the first time around, she had said that she
was unaware of any sexual abuse allegations until a therapist
brought them to her attention. So you see, Tom Sneddon make these
bizarre, kidnapping and coercion allegations sound credible, because
if the sexual assault allegations were such a well kept secret,
there was no reason to coerce anybody.
This case is too weird because it is not Michael Jackson but Tom
Sneddon who obstructs justice when he routinely targets anybody who
is in a position to disprove the fraudulent claim that Michael
jackson molested 12 year old Gavin Arvizo. Fortunately, for Michael
Jackson, he keeps good company, and that is making Tom Sneddon's job
very, very difficult. In particular, the two young college students
who will invariably be targeted because they essentially expose the
fraud behind Tom Sneddon's fraudulent allegations. Clearly, Frank
Tyson and Vincent Amen are not coercive, extortionists. Frank Tyson
and Vincent Amen, who watched over the family involved in the child
molestation charges, are just two, laid back, 23-year old college
students who were made weary by an overbearing guest at Neverland
Ranch. The mother of Jackson's accusers thought that Michael
Jackson's "help" was her own, and Amen, who was Tyson's college
buddy and wanted to work in video and music, was about to be made
weary by the mother of Michael Jackson's accuser. The demanding
opportunist with the imposing personality treated Amen and Tyson
like her personal babysitters and chauffeurs and she had clear
expectations about exploiting Michael Jackson as evidenced by her
anger over her view that the pop star had let her down because she
claimed that "Michael promised he'd make my kids stars." Is that why
her son was "exposed" in the Bashir documentary? And we are supposed
to think that he was a kidnapped victim who was subject to coercion?
If Tom Sneddon proves that, he is probably going to be the next
President of the United States.
The claim that the family was held against their will at
Neverland is very cute because the boys mother routinely abandoned
her children, forcing the college students, Frank Tyson and Vincent
Amen, to babysit while she socialized or went out with her
boyfriend, Army Reserves Major Jay Jackson. If this mother was
kidnapped, why didn't Army Reserves Major Jay Jackson, save her, or
is he also a part of this elaborate scheme to destroy Michael
Jackson? Clearly, one has to be literally brain-dead, to believe
that Michael Jackson or any of his supporters, conspired to kidnap a
woman who abandoned her children at Neverland Ranch because she is a
selfish, unfit mother who should be in jail for her participation in
this illegal, covert scheme to extort Michael Jackson.
No self-respecting authority would embrace this scam. Tom Sneddon
abuses the dignity of his office by upping the ante to add creedence
to transparent lies through the addition of "28 overt act charges"
that are supposed to create the impression that lunatic charges are
serious. At this point in time, it would be a huge revelation to
learn that Tom Sneddon is smart enough to be able to count to 10,
let alone produce 28 relevant allegations. The conspiracy count
which alleges 28 individual overt acts involving child abduction,
false imprisonment and extortion, is too stupid to take seriously,
whether it is protected by Grand Jury secrecy or not. Indeed,
publicizing the details will merely flesh out the illegal plot to
destroy Michael Jackson. The effort to create the impression that
sexual molestation charges against Michael Jackson, is not washing.
We did not have to read the Starr Report to figure out the fact that
Ken Starr was an overzealous crackpot, and the same goes for the so
called 28 overt acts, that are making Tom Sneddon's supporters
salivate. Clearly, the mother of the accuser had claimed that even
she was not aware of sexual molestation charges against Michael
Jackson, prior to May, and the claim that she was kidnapped to keep
her from talking about something that she did not even know about,
is as stupid as they come.
All nonsense aside, Tom Mesereau put it best, when he said, "this
case is about one thing only. It's about the dignity, the integrity,
the decency, the honor, the charity, the innocence and the complete
vindication of a wonderful human being named Michael Jackson." If
the other Tom thinks he can vindicate SneddonStory through
preposterous allegations, he is wrong. Those who currently claim
that Michael Jackson will be acquitted of the molestation charges
but will be convicted of conspiring to abduct the child and his
family, falsely imprison them and commit extortion by threatening
grave consequences if they accused him, are living in Neverland. Tom
Sneddon can offer the Pope immunity to testify for the prosecution,
but in the final analysis, he ought to be very careful because he is
jeopardizing the integrity of "state's evidence" the very same way
that Ken Starr destroyed the Independent Counsel Statute.
Update: Michael Jackson is not Tom Sneddon's only,
innocent target.
Next: Tom Sneddon's Strategy.
Plus: Lynching Michael
Jackson
The Genius of Michael Jackson
The Plot to Frame Michael Jackson
Tell us what you
think
|