In 2004, instead of granting me the benefits my insurer was contractually obligated to provide, my treatment providers were encouraged to discharge me, to create the false impression that chronic injuries were pre-existing rather than the consequence of a serious, June 30, 2003 accident.
The schemes of rogue private investigators who have invade every privacy, worked in concert with obsessive efforts to deny treatment and given the fact that they re all illegal it is no surprise that TD denies having hired any private investigator prior to 2008.
Actions speak louder than words
On January 29, 2004, when my physiotherapist treated my injuries, I produced the following 2 notes to document my treatment; The date and time on the top right side page corresponds to the notation on the left side page. Consequently, only I was aware of the fact that Jan/04 notation (which was used to produce a bogus medical script) in fact refers to the 29th day of January 2004, the actual physiotherapist visit the note refers to.
As a result of the separated shoulder I suffered on June 30 2003, my Doctor gave me the following medical prescription and it is entirely authentic
My medical file however contained a single, fabricated medical prescription which was clearly a word-for-word narration cripted entirely from my own personal notebook, and that is clearly the work of a private investigator with my insurer's overactive imagination. First and foremost, the person who copied my notebook did not know that "Jan/04" referred to the 29th day January and consequently made an error that would not otherwise exist. Secondly, the 4th day of January is a Sunday and since there was never any Doctor's visit on any Sunday, the contrast between the legitimate medical prescription which refers to an actual visit and the fabrication which bears no legitimacy at all is rather stark. Lastly, there is no condition called AC Joint Syroutis. The physiotherapist had simply made an error when she described my condition and I had simply transcribed what she had told me in my notebook. My actual condition was "AC Joint Synovitis" and not being medical Doctors, the private investigators who copied my notebook did not know enough to correct the error. Consequently, the only think that the private investigator(s) proved when they duplicated my personal notebook to produce a phony medical prescription is that they have invaded our privacy and it is time to hold TD accountable for this malignant scheme.
I personally believe tht it is equally malignant for any insurer to encourage treatment providers to discharge anybody with chronic injuries and if the law does not clearly call that malpractice, it is time to make that a clear precedent so that all victims of serious accidents can get the treatment they require to be able to function as normally as possible.
Clearly, it is very disturbing to discover this word-for-word transcription from my notebook to a Doctor's medical prescription.
I am currently suing my insurer for breach of contract and invasion of privacy and I hope this encourages other victims to do the very same because I am clearly not the only casualty of such malignant schemes.
Next: Corporations should not be able to get away with abusing the process.
Comments - Questions? -
VIPTUBE 1 | VIPTUBE 2 | VIPTUBE 3 | VIPTUBE 4 | VIPTUBE 5
