Keeping the Lights on

Four hours before underdog, Justin Trudeau beat the crap out of Conservative darling, Senator Patrick Brazeau, one million people gathered at Toronto's Nathan Phillips square, in body and spirit, to demand justice for the fact that Trayvon Martin, an unarmed black teenager, was murdered in cold blood.

Noticeably absent, from the throng that demanded justice were all the Conservative, tough-on-crime critics who live under the delusion that legislation or tougher laws are the magic bullet that will establish law and order. Where were they? Why aren't they demanding the arrest of Cold-Blooded murderer, George Zimmerman.

The fact is, we do not need tougher laws. We do not need better legislation. We need equal access to the laws that exist, and the only reason that a violent, cold blooded murderer can simply get away with murder is because equal access has been inappropriately denied.

How would a "real" journalist cover this protest for justice? Well, that's very easy to answer because a real reporter did cover it. If you saw the youtbe video, the camera panned to the outskirts of the small gathering, and that distinguished, white haired gentleman is none other than Toronto Star columnist, Oakland Ross. Unlike us, who noted a throng of millions at this vital rally, he counted only 50 people.

We counted millions because we know how access to justice is denied and how most people didn't know anything about the rally at Nathan Phillips square, so how could they possibly attend? We counted millions for all of the absences because they were glaring, and we intend to make millions aware, through this website.

So let us begin. After you get the privilege of reading Mr. Ross's story, follow us on Twitter as we ought to strive to fill in the glaring gaps that we saw, on March 31st 2012.


It's not the hoodie, it's who's inside
by Oakland Ross
Feature Writer
published April 1, 2012


Denial of Justice

W hat happened in Florida to a 17-year-old black youth named Trayvon Martin could also happen here, say local political activists who attended a rally honouring the slain American in Nathan Phillips Square Saturday night.

“It’s not just an American issue,” said community activist Trevor David. “It's a North American issue. All we’re asking is simple justice.”

About 50 demonstrators gathered in the springtime cold to express their anger and distress over the Florida boy's apparently unprovoked killing and the continuing failure of U.S. authorities to arrest his assailant.

Carrying placards and glow sticks, the demonstrators planned to march from City Hall to the U.S. consulate.

“There’s a lot of injustice in Canada, too,” said one young man who refused to give his name. “It could be any one of us.”

Many of the demonstrators wore hoodies, the same garment Martin was wearing when he was killed and that some say contributed to his death.

Since Martin’s fatal shooting in Florida in late February, the item of apparel known variously as a hoodie, hoody, or hooded sweatshirt has received a degree of international attention — and notoriety — few people would have expected.

“I was surprised,” admits Toronto author and pundit Christopher Dewdney. “Hoodies are ubiquitous now.”

But these casual pullovers and their controversial hoods still seem to pack a powerful cross-cultural punch — “a wearable Rorschach of contemporary American culture,” as one U.S. scribe put it last week.

If hoodies are a problem, then Sylvester Stallone is probably the man to blame.

More than anyone else, it was he who originally brought the look to the attention of mainstream North America — and the world.

In the smash 1976 film Rocky, Stallone played an underdog boxer who happened to wear a hoodie while in training, as boxers do.

Until then, the only other people who seemed to favour the garment were outdoor labourers in the northeastern United States and much of Canada, who wore hoodies because they’re warm.

“It’s a very practical form of winter wear,” says Dewdney. “What is it — 30 per cent of your heat goes out through your head?”

Following its break-out moment in the movie Rocky, the hoodie fashion was taken up by the hip-hop music culture in the U.S. and Britain, where the look did at first assume a somewhat sinister image, associated with violence and crime.

“Hoodies had a real street ‘gangsta’ association,” says Dewdney. “But that was 20 years ago. Now everybody wears them.”

Mainstream celebrities who’ve sported hoodies in public include Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, pop singers Selena Gomez and Avril Lavigne, comedian Bill Cosby, and former boxer Muhammad Ali, among many others.

And yet hoodies still make some people nervous.

U.S. broadcaster Geraldo Rivera broached the issue on Fox News late last month, when he seemed to blame Martin’s death as much on the hoodie he was wearing as on the man who shot him — 28-year-old George Zimmerman, who claims he acted in self-defence.

Rivera later apologized for his remarks, but hoodie-paranoia had been outed, to be met almost immediately by a powerful, countervailing force — people in hoodies.

Defenders of the garment include the Miami Heat basketball team, which posed for publicity photos while dressed in hoodies, a group of Washington-area pastors, who conducted services in hoodies, and U.S. Congressman Bobby I. Rush, a Democrat from Illinois, who last Wednesday appeared on the floor of Congress dressed in a grey hoodie.

“Just because someone wears a hoodie does not make them a hoodlum,” he said.

But hoodies do tend to obscure the faces of those wearing them, and that upsets some people, many of them merchants. Or bankers.

Authorities from Australia to California have sought to put limits on how hoodies are worn.

“Just take down the hood when you enter a business,” Los Angeles police lieutenant Alan Hamilton said the other day. “It’s not raining in the bank.”

On the other hand, Justice Dianne Nicholas of the Ontario Court of Justice last month acquitted a youth of being an accessory to a bank robbery. The main evidence against him? He wore a hoodie.

“Hoodies are now commonplace attire, and no longer have a nefarious connotation,” she ruled.

Trayvon Martin would have applauded her words, but he was already dead.


Next: The Details of this Travesty of Justice.
 
 

Follow toronto4trayvon on Twitter

 
murder victim
 
NEWSWORLD SHOWDOWN
Copyright © 2012